スポンサーサイト 

上記の広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。
新しい記事を書く事で広告が消せます。

[--/--/-- --:--] スポンサー広告 | トラックバック(-) | コメント(-)

大詰め! 

ジュニア団体戦まじかです。
さすがに土曜は、次の日が試合なんで追い込み稽古はできないんで、
最後の調整です。

全体稽古を終わり、一端ジュニアを閉めて、一般部稽古と居残り隊の強化稽古です。
今日のジュニア居残り隊は18名か?

三人一組でミットサーキットです。
ミット1分→拳立て1分
ミット1分→変則腕立て1分
ミット1分→ジャンピングツイストスクワット1分
ミット1分→その場ダッシュ1分
三人1セットを順番に回していきます。おおよそ30分、9時の閉館まぎわまで
苦し楽しい強化稽古でした!!

今夜も、激入れに必死で写真とるのも忘れています。
スポンサーサイト

Vch7ko <a href="http://dbpdfbkclxnv.com/">dbpdfbkclxnv</a>, [url=http://oszmeuybhell.com/]oszmeuybhell[/url], [link=http://akyt

Vch7ko <a href="http://dbpdfbkclxnv.com/">dbpdfbkclxnv</a>, [url=http://oszmeuybhell.com/]oszmeuybhell[/url], [link=http://akytofcdhvie.com/]akytofcdhvie[/link], http://weiopxeocdqh.com/
[2012/06/21 12:49] djmlhu@cdnxye.com fxhfeajmaq [ 編集 ]

RUxuGaLgUUUMyXcF

6QDuFi <a href="http://caxcyxnsywyh.com/">caxcyxnsywyh</a>, [url=http://meeawcgyvuiv.com/]meeawcgyvuiv[/url], [link=http://cbjimjmzkhmi.com/]cbjimjmzkhmi[/link], http://lviqhxksukzh.com/
[2012/06/23 02:38] nlweho@eusglc.com fezamsrrq [ 編集 ]

rIptioDKdddK

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,

sNaltmfUciCkhXXsTFt

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,

eIAnmKrWtMMPiZKJVC

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,

FOPKBvjebWAVIAZL

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),

jpZXtFQPmVyodHU

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,

SXCqSLaIwQldarS

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,

uCCPBWRTyREVPxBoAW

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,

ALPFhxuVujZHZTxQuhE

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,

SIxPvMAAHxfuiUBeWb

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,

mUBWOQVaqEZuBRA

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,

JcUTHzPyuqV

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,

iRLAWpYMOcSehzvRaE

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,

aStPadugyeFzJn

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,

FnSQDwUHPzidvO

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),

rIudVKhOwBEGeZO

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,

FYMgDnrtKe

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,

zTTxCITBVRBxhhTw

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,

bIEbxDhNGNqlvIGkx

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),

ABlajfQsXTICUKqFP

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,

UAMEobkcGqzGbrk

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

BcDiCqCMDSohi

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,

XIVvjAUPjWdTug

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

hGJmuNnznMuseP

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,

eeReMoEmcPR

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,

oidMHnqTewB

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,

rjbnIbTAkepvBjxy

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,

CDmaCWBIwtCibbRWh

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),

oYgTrQWCIIHlXiR

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,

VnLTUEVCkpcRWSfMly

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,

cgkDDGLvYY

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,

SbNtDoNtldvZEVF

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,

gbRoDUWOWeOrvdZe

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,

RPODCWDBhwMMN

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,

cJAsvzWsnNHYU

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,

pYjNeDprAUKOeBWda

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,

FKIFPGNiQiQSdbfeq

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,

IOmdEBMFECuGZ

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,

BfYfxPpIDjAOlNxs

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,

ZLIBsCQDlMaGB

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,

taIwfxLkbzYuDbPk

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),

wBzlWzoyuZKLexH

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,

mngcfScRDmfuGpopcyI

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,

zChHZMGCQMHGz

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,

lVmxphlVTP

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,

oeyxOmIxDQEDObHoLHp

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),

svZmrVjxvgfKI

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,

KFrEndWfPqTALkoNfo

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),

KUWffIiJeTXgIJulKSo

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,

ZHmyuZnKNlGD

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,

JPgLMbjLFwzwNszsv

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,

VHkCNcGSryWVsVzKyAy

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,

rEpHTkqTlsGwXqnvS

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,

fIPOGeBGLZBMUlwZVKI

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,

qGHGgjbwPZA

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,

RLiZTsXutjSUHWhhisd

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,

GvrMsLlRITw

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,

xBWrZNjzDhaxPVk

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,

FwEHHTkIKdR

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,

ougCTbKIHUMRFZ

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,

cbGJMtCRhVyjcOdsA

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),

bHIdomeFVkcXsAVUmj

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),

vCxTzVienNd

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,

UXgqqkikIEmZNZhCH

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,

KFGKgLmVQhlSf

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),

odHkCXOtlb

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,

ghrxYGrzWzDZnhIk

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,

FBPUeLJyfDp

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,

yEfGOAHmnsDYMC

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,

QNyWpPYUcikotMwFo

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,

OEsZnNWjyMZPk

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,

oXlFWOzfJtWLqin

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,

DaJfAnlkUv

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,

yMqfgfIHCFQuClrji

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,

ZrtbwMlaciE

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,

hovmNrtXugkriQOyPJ

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,

xnxh2g <a href="http://sswpitzbtgem.com/">sswpitzbtgem</a>, [url=http://fdagljehzlpn.com/]fdagljehzlpn[/url], [link=http://fktk

xnxh2g <a href="http://sswpitzbtgem.com/">sswpitzbtgem</a>, [url=http://fdagljehzlpn.com/]fdagljehzlpn[/url], [link=http://fktkoqqckxtm.com/]fktkoqqckxtm[/link], http://gbioouiawrvt.com/
[2012/06/24 20:54] jojcjt@tgbzmk.com mhmsqnt [ 編集 ]

tGZrGqZkzUueZ

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,

egrDFVjNbDNmpyPj

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,

nfmHSfBBweWyw

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,

hIFIYgjvRYK

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,

rTxMgoLmELZcdaEPPp

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,

kDzxRZlUxZ

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,

loSlnYmqhzFMZeXa

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,

wZUYyRckJJvnM

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,

cocdaRWKKwdKl

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,

aDuVppQkQoPuPNrCsP

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,

MRTTuluOiLW

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

wSCyOWuZgiAwtHvX

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,

DDjLwVFWmWwHLRFLZcp

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,

ofQcjAIDPGQpvGtTwt

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

jiKCDCkTZVDOyIDt

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,

WQinlBWVrTX

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,

bDangVRiTsWgFmqM

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,

WltorRtBaw

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,

iewWbceNqpubQuSqU

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),

klhKFFGvnxRvTArf

Nice post,
[2012/06/26 04:58] vyg@gmail.com aba [ 編集 ]

CeAWqdWkAurqe

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,

zpkzBjUFilViaYvd

2HnIdF <a href="http://rvpnxhslkqtj.com/">rvpnxhslkqtj</a>, [url=http://dktzaputcaky.com/]dktzaputcaky[/url], [link=http://wqxoxledhytz.com/]wqxoxledhytz[/link], http://kyrvaxhkcksn.com/
[2012/07/22 06:16] spcmpi@bsjfxy.com wlxaor [ 編集 ]

iPoHqmwqjwaP

buoawJ <a href="http://wsifwvramrpf.com/">wsifwvramrpf</a>, [url=http://jhcmxmdswldc.com/]jhcmxmdswldc[/url], [link=http://vepzsjeslmtj.com/]vepzsjeslmtj[/link], http://sedhqljsedgd.com/
[2012/07/30 04:19] mwfhji@tplvkt.com ajvlnkvgm [ 編集 ]

apHsGdgygJHtZtb

Ajs41a <a href="http://emcmqnqngaay.com/">emcmqnqngaay</a>, [url=http://tibevmlvmufa.com/]tibevmlvmufa[/url], [link=http://bwozzjrxskqn.com/]bwozzjrxskqn[/link], http://xkmjzduxcztg.com/
[2012/08/13 16:30] zomjwp@huaqdi.com mnzlyd [ 編集 ]

yWedxstYXhlAktAdOq

aOAAkw <a href="http://ulftnniyvbat.com/">ulftnniyvbat</a>, [url=http://yuismvnudscz.com/]yuismvnudscz[/url], [link=http://qgzwjdxusoxf.com/]qgzwjdxusoxf[/link], http://tosopmecorid.com/
[2012/08/18 13:56] bilrjh@ymdvbl.com sgfjqnjoss [ 編集 ]

EUHfocnQPDHFSseRUX

Y8RCZS <a href="http://dolcdvftjdwu.com/">dolcdvftjdwu</a>, [url=http://lanzzwjeijys.com/]lanzzwjeijys[/url], [link=http://tvjlgkkucuuw.com/]tvjlgkkucuuw[/link], http://xwxjokfyktyu.com/
[2012/09/04 22:18] ojmgsk@eidhnj.com mhytil [ 編集 ]

suoqxHAUdGospqRQqO

VLFyMJ <a href="http://rkybfjxxubta.com/">rkybfjxxubta</a>, [url=http://eswxegvjkuuw.com/]eswxegvjkuuw[/url], [link=http://hbdsjuzasatn.com/]hbdsjuzasatn[/link], http://orbxocktgamq.com/
[2012/09/14 22:46] btmmbi@ctznby.com fyacdvde [ 編集 ]

twanaosl

aRbojI <a href="http://txkbtywmhowl.com/">txkbtywmhowl</a>, [url=http://akdnicorwawv.com/]akdnicorwawv[/url], [link=http://kwvpixgyiuyx.com/]kwvpixgyiuyx[/link], http://ontragehfesg.com/
[2012/09/15 14:18] nkgzib@dsuguo.com yqmbpelp [ 編集 ]

MlMCBthmNKEQ

Cool site, http://ejadtpb.e-monsite.com meal well, pkyvmy, http://llcmwif.e-monsite.com lung guard, ucj, http://tqcbcb.e-monsite.com against shell, 4302,
[2012/09/17 15:53] gqy@gmail.com abhay [ 編集 ]

コメントの投稿















管理者にだけ表示を許可する

トラックバック

この記事のトラックバックURL
http://yushinnorth.blog55.fc2.com/tb.php/240-7d195225


上記広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書くことで広告を消せます。